Tuesday, September 30, 2014

M203 on my Colt Canada SA20






I should have written a disclaimer for this post, but didn’t think people would even find this picture, let alone take it seriously.  The 203 launcher is not real.  The last time I checked, a real one went for $6,000 on EE (CGN).  I understand you can buy a 37mm flare launcher for less, but I don’t see a reason to launch flares from a Restricted firearm at a registered shooting range.  That's not to say I wouldn't buy the real deal if I could afford it, hahaha!


So, for fun, I threw on an Airsoft 203 launcher on my SA20 just to see what it would look like, that’s all.  No harm in doing that as it was only on there for the photo shoot, I certainly don’t take it to the range like that.  Why did I do this?


Because….





Lol!


Monday, September 29, 2014

Colt Canada SA20 with Drop-in Rail Adapter System (KAC M5 RAS/P&S Products)

Well, I finally dug up some rails out of storage for my SA20.  I got these off an American from an exercise a few years ago and was going to put them on my C7 during the ex, but my COC (chain of command, in case some were wondering) advised me it was not a good idea to modify my rifle, even if the mod wasn’t permanent.  He didn’t personally mind, but if seen by someone else, I’d be sure to hear about it and so would he.  So, into my duffle they went, and when I got home, they were put away since I didn’t have a 20” barrel at the time.   I almost forgot about them and was thinking about buying a set when I remembered that I had some buried in my mountain of crap downstairs.  The Americans we worked with were a great bunch of guys.  They were all really easy going, but professional at the same time.  They were great hosts and I would love to work with them again.







As you can see, these rails were not manufactured by Knight’s Armament Company (KAC), but they appear to be identical to their KAC M5 RAS.  These are not to be confused with a cheap Chinese Airsoft knock off, these are definitely the real deal.  I did a little research and according to WpnsMan and coldblue (who I suspect might work for KAC?) from AR15.com, the rails were manufactured by P&S Products/DBA Molding Solutions out of Lexington, KY.  P&S received their initial contract in 2007 and were received between April and September of 2009.  






The M5 RAS was easy to install, and went in with little effort on my part.  There’s a mechanism that locks on to the gas tube and it really tightens everything down.  There’s absolutely no wobble whatsoever and the entire hand guard feels solid.







The railed hand guard on its own likely made out of aluminum and weight-wise does not feel much heavier than the original issued plastic hand guard, but once you start throwing on accessories like lights, lasers, NV, the kitchen sink etc, ounces start feeling like pounds. 






The markings are very simple, and really designed for the lowest common denominator.  The top rails are marked with a T, the bottom rails are marked with a B, left with an L and right with an R.  There are also markings inside to indicate direction the rails are to be mounted.  It’s really hard to screw it up, but I suppose it’s been done. 





Along with the covers and vertical grip that came with the kit, I threw on an Airsoft knock-off of the Diemaco TRIAD rail.  I just put it on for the photo, but Colt Canada has stated that they are looking into selling the TRIAD rail again.  I’ll probably buy one if the price is right.  Not really so much because I like the extra rail, but I do want to somewhat match the issued “look”. 




My SA20


And rack #47, my C7A2 for comparison.



I really want an Elcan to complete the build, but I don’t see myself being able to afford one in my lifetime.  For now though, the Bushnell that’s on there now provides crystal clear glass and variable magnification that’s just a hair more than the Elcan.  Also, the Bushnell is illuminated so for target shooting that this rifle is more than sufficiently equipped.  I could also use more magnification, but we’ll see later on seeing as how the nearest range maxes out at 200m. 

Some references for the C7A2:


And a great post from WB from army.ca regarding weapons modding:

Which can be a good thing or a bad thing, depending...


Contrary to what some might claim, sub-unit commanders have been turning a blind eye (even authorizing?) drop-in weapon modifications overseas. These include KAC Rails, ACOGs and Aimpoints, VLTOR buttstocks, ect. Some of these are more of a hassle than others to install, but none will leave any permanent changes to the weapon. The individual soldier could easily draw his weapon, modify it, then change it back and return it to stores exactly how it was issued to him.

Overall, I think the fact that this is becoming commonplace is a step in the right direction. But I've also seen these "unofficial sub-unit policies" manifest themselves in pretty retarded ways too. For the couple guys in my coy who were sporting ACOGs and Aimpoints, there was one who had a civvie pattern hunting scope on his rifle. For the handfull of guys who were wearing high quality chest rigs from reputable companies, there were also those who were wearing locally made rigs that were falling apart by the end of tour. The same went for slings (ref: POS locally made 1-points) and boots (and no-one will convince me that a zipper up the side of your boot is a good idea). As much as I think that letting troops take some initiative with drop-in weapons modifications is a good idea, I have to admit that it's a double edged sword. Some would be better off sticking with the issued gear.

I think the solution is not in standardization, but instead in education. Its great that non-issed gear is becoming more acceptable in Afghanistan, but if the guys can't train with their gear in Canada they won't have the experience to know whats good and what isn't. Really, all a guy can do today to make an informed purchase is read second-hand info from internet forums or have friends in the more open minded branches of the CF. Troops should be encouraged to take the initiative and experiment with gear while in Canada so they arn't wasting their money and risking their lives on POS gear in Afghanistan.

Friday, September 19, 2014

Colt Canada SA20 - civvie version of the C7A2

Talk about a rocky introduction of this rifle to the Canadian firearms market. I first heard of the Colt Canada/Diemaco C7 for civilian sales back in July, and was pretty excited to hear about it because the initial spiel was that Colt Canada was expecting a market because police officers and military personnel have inquired about acquiring their own versions for shooting and practice.


The summer of 2014 was probably the best time in recent years to get into an AR, and probably not the best time to introduce a new rifle to the market and try to sell it as a premium rifle with a premium price. With business like Wolverine Supplies, SFRC and irunguns.ca in the middle of a price war, you’d be hard pressed to find a reason NOT to buy an AR. Prices in the US were dropping dramatically because supply finally caught up with demand, then passed it, leaving manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers grossly overstocked with ARs. The effect crossed the border and we started to see Colt ARs from irunguns go for about $1,000 or less (when they have historically been seen to sell at $2,500), which was now on par with Walmart USA pricing. Irunguns also started bringing in DPMS rifles for about $550-600, either used, new, or in kit form. Wolverine started selling Daniel Defence starting at $1,000 and then SFRC started blowing out their NEAs. This led a big part of the community guessing that the new Colt Canada rifles should be at the most $1500 or less. The days of buying Norinco ARs because they were the cheapest around ($700) were over, and even they saw some price drops, though not as drastic (about $600 for a Norc now).

When Colt Canada finally revealed their new rifles as the SA20 (C7A2) and the SA15.7 (C8A3), gun owners in Canada collectively held their breath as the retailers revealed the MSRP, and collectively let out a big WTF when it was announced that the SA20 will sell for $2,099 and the SA15.7 will sell for $2,299. HUGE debates were held on the major Canadian gun forums, arguments back and forth, numerous threads were locked, members were banned, and a lot of bad blood was spilled on those forums.

I don’t really want to go into too much detail here, and start an argument with myself, but the jist of it was that the new Colt Canada SA20 and SA15.7s were presumably excellent rifles if their LE/MIL versions are a testament to their potential performance. Was $2k+ what people wanted to pay? No. Were they $2k+ rifles? Debatable. Maybe before the price war, but definitely not during this past summer. LE/MIL members were still left to hold their breath because many thought Colt Canada could not possibly think that $2k+ is something the average member would spend to buy equipment to practice on their own time.

Rumours spread about an IOP (individual officer program) and that an LE/MIL discount was on the horizon. Meanwhile, the non LE/MIL were still arguing back and forth on the MSRP. A lot of bad things were said of Colt Canada, and the Korth Group (distributors for Colt). Even retailers were heard to grumble some nasty things about them as they were not able to move many rifles. Word got out from one of the retailers that the Korth group were probably making quite a bit of money from these rifles, and the blame could not be placed on Colt Canada. In fact, word got out on exactly how much they were making, because it didn’t take long for friends of retailers to figure out what their cost was. It was chaos.

To pour more fuel on the fire, some incorrect information was released by an uninformed employee stating that there would be no individual officer program, there would be no LE/MIL discount. Chaos had turned into outright Armageddon. Cries of false advertisement and bait and switch were heard throughout the community and I’m sure sales of these rifles reflected it. It didn’t take long for Colt Canada and the Korth Group to make an appearance to salvage the situation. Representatives from Colt Canada like Matt Kirkpatrick soon joined Canadian Gun Nutz to distribute technical data and other information regarding their products, and a very helpful Andres Gonzalez became the official representative from Korth Group to assist members of Law Enforcement and the Military. These two gentlemen probably saved the release of the SA20 and SA15.7 from total disaster.

The MSRP was adjusted shortly after the IOP was announced, and the new prices were $1,799 for the SA20 and $1,999 for the SA15.7. Prices for the IOP were not announced publically, and that will be between members of LE/MIL and the Korth Group. There were still grumblings on the forums, but not nearly at the same capacity as before. Also, with Colt Canada on board at CGN, a lot of old wive’s tales were dispelled and it became painfully clear that a comparison between Colt Canada’s rifles and Colt USA was not exactly on the same playing field. For reference, go to CGN and look up Colt Canada’s posts on the specs of these rifles over their US-made counterparts. Another great reference is Guns and Ammo, The Book of the AR15, issue August, 2012. There’s a very detailed article indicating the differences between Colt Canada and Colt USA products, advantage, Colt Canada!

Anwyay, that’s my long, drawn out background history about Colt Canada’s first offerings to the civilian market. There was no way I could pay $2,099 for an SA20, there’s still no way I could pay $1,799, and I can barely scrape by at the IOP rate, but I swallowed the pill and took the plunge.


The rifle came shipped in a plain cardboard box......


......inside another cardboard box, haha!


Actually, I'm glad it came that way.  I don't always keep my boxes, but I think I'll keep this one.  Nice, huge sticker indicating the Diemaco brand and Made in Canada with a big Colt logo in the background.





It would have been nice if it'd came in a hardcase like Daniel Defence rifles, but that would just drive costs up, and I'm fine that they used cardboard to keep costs low.


Everything was well packed, in individual plastic bags.  I wish I could afford to buy mutliples of this rifle, and keep one "new in box:".  That's the geeky collector inside me that buys toys but doesn't play with them.



The rilfle came packed with goodies, including a magazine lock, a very well equipped Otis cleaning kit, a sling (that I will probably never use), one standard STANAG magazine (with a plastic follower...nice touch), the owner's manual and a Colt Sticker. 






It also came with a super-duper muzzle cap, good for keeping dirt out of the muzzle, but this rifle probably won't be accompanying me on many patrols to warrant it's use.

Some people were moaning about the finish on the front sight triagle.  Yeah, it's a bit rough (actually, more rough that my Norinco).  I suppose they left it as is for a number of reasons, maybe to cut costs, or to give it that “military” utilitarian look, but the sight post itself is nice and thin, and much finer than the one on my Norc.


The roll marks aren’t identical to the C7A2 that I use at work, but it’s nice to see the maple leaf there.  I thought they might have stamped Made in Canada in English and French at least, but that was not to be.    


An observation made by many was the backwards installation of the back up iron sight.  Some guessed maybe it was because they wanted the shooter to see the Colt lettering, others claimed it was because of the smaller aperture (not sure why they would think this since it’s adjustable anyway), but Colt Canada came on and said it was simply just a mistake.


Still in it's original packing oil from the factory.





The bolt carrier appears to be a standard AR-15 version, not the M16 full-automatic carrier commonly seen on US-made Colts.  Now, for those of you who are reading this and are not familiar with AR bolt carriers, having a full auto bolt carrier will not alone enable the rifle to engage in automatic fire.  Some users simply prefer it because there is more material on the carrier and believe it is more durable. 
As for the lower receiver pocket, it does not have the partition like the Colt LE6920 or M4 Carbine (civvie version) but I’ve got some comparison pictures up in another post you can see later on. 


Colt Canada has indicated that the “claw” charging handle and the issued C7 sling plate are no longer in production, so they have included their new sling plate and a standard charging handle.










Stripped and cleaned for inspection....thank God I don't have to go through that again.  I'm also thankful that I won't have to worry about some other nugget messing with my rifle.  This one truly is mine, and will not be shared with strangers going through BMQ, gouging the $hit out of it in an effort to get everything clean.






A minor detail, but apparently an important one for many.  The “D” mark indicating Diemaco.


6 position buffer tube, as opposed to the 4 position as originally indicated (and found on the US Colt LE6920 and other models).



The green furniture was an added bonus for members of law enforcement and military, and only available through the IOP. 







These rifles are considered by Colt their 30th anniversary limited editions. They say that only 1,000 of these rifles were manufactured, 500 SA20s and 500 SA15.7s. Ten of each model were reserved for Colt Canada’s internal uses, so 490 per model will be sold to the public. Further models and milspec components are planned for release this year.


So I’m not sure how smart it was to jump on one of these for a clone of the work rifle to practice with on my own time. Should I have waited out for a cheaper model with similar specs to be released or was it better to grab one while they were still available? Who knows, but with the IOP, it made it a lot easier than trying to justify to the wife that I absolutely needed to spend $2099 so I could buy a copy of the work rifle, spend my own ammo, and my own personal time, unpaid, just so I could practice my marksmanship skills for queen and country.

My personal preference would have been that they simply mass produced these rifles instead of limiting them to 490 rifles of each model. But because they have called it a limited edition, and because I know they will be coveted by collectors, I am hesitant to use the rifle and put it through the same abuse I put the work rifle through. I now have the unfortunate mentality to baby it and treat it like a safe queen. Damn, I wish I had enough money to buy them in multiples, haha!



Not quite a daisho, but pretty close.

 Not quite a daisho, but close at a quick glance.  A lot of times, daisho didn't have perfectly matched koshirae, or even blades from th...