Friday, April 7, 2017

The worst job I've ever had.

I'm not really sure why I'm ranting about this now, in this blog of all places, but I figured I may as well post it here since the original thread on AR15.com got archived.  Anyway, it's not exactly the thing you want to put in your resume or cover letter, but it got a few comments over on ARF and I was glad that I was able to bring a few smiles to them after reading my story.  The thread was titled What's the worst job you've ever had, and here is my story:

I used to worked at a call center for major Canadian airline, specifically their loyalty program. It was the worst job I've ever had, bar none. I remember there were times when I was at my desk in that God forsaken place, I often wondered if perhaps my colleagues and I were actually dead, and that we were in hell. Because of our proximity to YVR, the theory that a plane had crashed and killed us all wouldn't be a huge stretch of the imagination, and we were living out eternity in that hell hole.

We were tethered to our computer for the entire shift, hundreds of us at any given time. Every second not on a call was accounted for, every time you got up to the washroom, someone was aware of it, you're breaks were counted to the second.

There was a console with about half a dozen supervisors in it monitoring the staff's activities. We called it the watch tower. If you didn't take a call within a few minutes, your name would be highlighted on one of their screens. If it continued, you would see one of the supervisors stand up, and if you still didn't take a call, you would see one of the supervisors detach and make their way to your station. If your stats were no good, you were offered more training, passive aggressive conditioning to get you to take more calls. You're sitting in the chair opposite of your dirt bag of a supervisor (think Office Space) every month, reviewing your performance, smiling the whole time while giving you suggestions on how to do better.

We were abused by clients, and we were abused by our supervisors. The clients would be yelling and screaming because they couldn't use their points to book a flight, and our supervisors were always pushing us to make bookings when there was hardly any inventory to book. I would say that in any given 8 hr shift, I would take 75-100 calls, and had a booking success rate of about 15-20%. The rest of the calls were $hit and I guarantee you the client would be channeling all of their hatred toward you because they weren’t able to use their points to book a flight one year in advance.  The company was telling customers that they could use their points for all these wonderful destinations, but in reality, we had less than 10% of the flight to give away to folks with points.

We had a "quiet room" in the building. It was a room within a room, and inside that room was a taste of heaven. It was pitch black inside, and the only noise you could detect was the faint hum of the ventilation system. There were two or three couches inside (I've only seen the room lit a handful of times, so I don't clearly recall) where staff would take turns and rest. To get to this room, you would go through the locker room, open one door, enter a chamber, close the door behind you, and open the door to the quiet room. Once inside, you literally could not see anything.  There was no ambient light whatsoever, and it was the same as if you closed your eyes. You just had to feel your way to one of the couches and hope no one was occupying it.

The darkness was like pure joy, as if happiness was something tangible that you could wrap yourself with. When I lay on that couch, curled up in the fetal position, I couldn't get over how happy I was. I felt myself smile in the darkness because I was not at my station taking calls.

However, breaks in the quiet room could be demoralizing as well.  We all knew that happiness would eventually end and we would have to go back to our phones and computers. My body clock was so conditioned that I was able to close my eyes, lose consciousness (at least I felt I did), only to wake up like a bolt after exactly 12 minutes. It left just enough time to get up, get back to my desk and log in again.  The instant I sat back down and my desk, I was already looking forward my next break and race back to the quiet room and begin the cycle again.

In my 7 years in that hellhole, I saw at least one or two people die per year for some sort of illness. I saw people rapidly age in that call center, with my own friends and family commenting on how haggard I looked after only a few short years of working there. I still have nightmares about the place.

A few years after I left, I got a job where I had access to certain information regarding social services and medical leave. I was shocked to see that at least once a week one of my old colleagues would come in to apply for medical benefits, more specifically for stress leave. When I worked there, I knew that people occasionally took stress leave from that place, but not to that magnitude.  Every week, I'd see someone new come in, and they looked as though they had just escaped from Auschwitz.

I still bump into some of my old colleagues from time to time, and the first thing they notice or comment on is how happy I seem to be now. The first thing I notice is the hopelessness in their eyes, their souls have long since left their bodies, and they have the appearance of a person who already has one foot in the grave.


This job, like a scar on my soul, is a constant reminder that things could always be worse. I've excelled at every job I've had since then, I get paid a lot more, and even joined the military as a reservist on top of my day job. I think the only reason I enjoyed my basic training (and every job I’ve ever had since the airline, come to think of it) while everyone else was miserable was because I'd experienced firsthand what hell was actually like.

Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Glock 17 G4 in Stealth Grey thanks to Rampart Corp's Glock IOP

Well, I finally scratched that itch I've had to get a Glock,  It's been maybe 5 years since I tried a Glock for the first time, my pal Jay's 17 in OD green.  It was one of the reasons I got into firearms in the first place and my original plan was to buy one as soon as I got my PAL.  Over the years, that plan fell by the wayside and I kept on putting it off and putting it off until now.  



There have been a few other companies offering the IOP (Individual Officer Program), but right now the program is being offered through Rampart Corporation and they put out a deal that I couldn't resist.  I spoke to my pal that works at the local gun shop and it turns out that the IOP is below dealer cost.  

To be honest, I don’t know a thing about Glocks.  I didn’t do any research before buying this one and besides my buddy’s G17, I’ve never really played around with them.  All I knew about it was from its reputation, that it was ugly but one of the most reliable handguns you could ask for.  So bear with this unboxing because I've probably shot a glock less than 5 times in my life and you really are reading this from a Glock noob's point of view.



The 17 came with three 10 round Glock mags, the cable lock that nobody has any use for, a cleaning brush, a magazine loader, the manual and a few stickers and a pen from Rampart to notate the Glock IOP program.


I think this stealth grey is a new color for 2016/2017?  It does look pretty good and doesn't really stand out as flashy or anything.  


The accessory rail is a simple design with a single notch in it for your pic-rail weapon light mount.  The one thing I've read about that does sort of stick out in my mind is the gap between the frame and the slide.  A lot of new Glock owners will be alarmed by this as the frame of some examples will appear upward sweeping towards the muzzle end and will often be mistaken for a warped frame.  I've seen on the local forums that this topic periodically pops up from time to time.  In this example, and the example I saw at Reliable Gun, the frame appeared straight, however I was told that there is still no guarantee that they are all straight.  That being said, my pals that own Glocks tell me that the appearance of the warped frame has no bearing on the gun's performance, and the frame does not interfere with the slide at all. and more importantly does not affect accuracy or function in any way.



When I grip the pistol, the first thing I notice is how well it forms to my hand.  I'm able to establish a fairly firm grip, my fingers don't slip down and I'm able to ride my hand pretty high on the tail.  I think this is because of a combination of the finger groves in the grip, the factory stippling and the overall shape of the grip.  As pretty as some of my other handguns are, I don't feel the same positive grip as I can with the Glock.  Once I latch on to it, the gun feels like an extension of my hand.  

There's also a slight notch where the trigger guard meets the grip and it's probably designed to capture your middle finger, allowing you to ride higher with the grip.  I've seen many people file or dremel their own notches into pistols that don't come with it.  Nice touch.



I opted for the most basic model with fixed sights.  You can order Glocks with adjustable sights for an extra $50 or so, and nightsights for an extra $100 or so.  In a defensive situation, I suppose night sights would be handy, but I've got three other pistols that already have night sights, and I've never shot in the dark at the range.  In the worst case scenario where the world goes to hell and civilization is over-run with zombies, well, I have a few other guns to choose from.



A lot of my pistols have the front slide serrations and I like them because I'm use to them.  It gives me something to grab on to when I want to to a brass check, but that being said, I'm not going to wither up and die if my gun doesn't have them.  Some people are thankful that some guns don't have them because apparently they tend to tear up holsters.   The nose of the pistol appears to be beveled just enough not to catch on any material when holstering, so I think this was definitely considered during the design.  


Size and weight wise, I'd say it closely compares to my Walther PPQ (there are probably better comparisons, but this is the closest I own).  The threaded barrel on my PPQ makes it just a touch longer than the G17, but overall, they're pretty close in size.  The Glock feels slightly top heavy compared to my PPQ, but I won't know if this is a good or bad thing until I shoot it, and I have to confess, I don't shoot my Walther as much as I'd like to.  

Now, I don't recall how my pal's G17 shoots, or how his trigger feels, but after dry firing my new G17 a few times, I've come to the conclusion it's not going to be one of my favorite triggers.  It felt gritty and spongy compared to the Walther, and certainly did not break like a glass rode.  But as I understand it, the Glock was designed to be abused and to be able to function under the worst conditions.  At 5-25m, I would imagine that as long as it goes bang when you want it to, it's all good.

For the few things I don't like about the Glock, there are about a million aftermarket solutions that support it.  There are probably just as many aftermarket companies catering to Glock owners as there are 1911 owners, so if there's something that's really irking me about it, I can probably have it sorted out.  That being said though, I'll probably shoot it as is, and probably not mess with it too much, if at all.  

I have other pistols that I've tinkered with, but I have a feeling this one I will leave as it was designed.  It has a reputation for being a tool, a blunt instrument that's not the prettiest, not necessarily the most accurate or precise and fun to shoot, but it is supposed to be reliable that you could depend your life on it.  

Magpul SGA handguard, now with M-Lok!












Mk12 build - Diemaco BCG, Aero Precision Assembled Upper Receiver

I ordered a few parts for this build a while ago but only got around to taking some pics last night. First up is the BCG.  I looked through my spare parts bin and found that I didn’t have an extra one buried in there somewhere, and SFRC had a great deal on surplus Diemaco f/a BCGs so I grabbed one.  I would say not too bad for $199.  

I know the D mark is desirable among collectors, but I really got it because I just needed a BCG and a brand new Colt Canada BCG runs about $339.95 on sale over at Nordic Marksman ($419.95 regular).  I paid about $199 USD for my Colt USA BCG and it looks like SFRC has a few surplus ones for about $189 CAD.  For the $10, I just got one with the D, lol!



Anyway, from top to bottom, the Colt Canada hybrid BCG that came with my SA20, a Colt USA f/a BCG that came with my LE6920, and the Diemaco f/a BCG.  I have no idea how the Diemaco looked when brand new, but as you can see from the pics, the CC hybrid carrier has a lot darker finish than the Colt USA one.  I'm wondering if this is also the case with the CC f/a carriers?  

The wear on the surplus Diemaco BCG wasn’t horrendous or anything.  It basically looked like the ones in our C7s – worn appearance, but smooth to handle (basically dehorned from use) and no gouges or major blemishes.


A shot of the bolt faces, from left to right the Diemaco, the Colt USA and the Colt Canada hyrbid carrier.


From top to bottom, a comparison of the staking between the three BCGs.  From top to bottom, Diemaco, Colt USA and Colt Canada.  It looks like the Diemaco and Colt USA staking is a bit more aggressive than the Colt Canada hybrid, but I'm sure it won't be an issue.



The markings.  The Diemaco at the top is indicated with the stylized D mark, the Colt USA is a simple C and the Colt Canada is marked with two Cs.





All three bolts are MPC tested, but marked in different areas.  I did the basic test to see if the gas rings were still good on the Diemaco by standing the BCG on the bolt face and it did not drop, so I think it's still good.

Anyway, I'm fairly confident that the Diemaco BCG is good to go, my only regret is not buying a few more because they are not all sold out.  I was thinking maybe I'll throw the Diemaco BCG into my SA20 to further the C7A2 clone theme, and use the CC hybrid unit in my Mk12 build, but decided why bother, I'll probably just get another for my SA20 if these ever pop up again.


As it turns out, my spare parts bin was all out of spare uppers  so I needed to go find myself an upper.  I visited my buddy Hermes over at Reliable and he had one left, an Aero Precision assembled upper receiver.  I've read mixed reviews on these uppers, but figured for $130, it was hard to go wrong so I grabbed it.  



What can I say, it looked like any other upper I've had, the splintered "A" marking suggesting that it came from the Anchor Harvey Aluminum forge.  In case anyone is obsessing over forge marks, I found this list:

A (splintered) = Anchor Harvey Aluminum
AF = Alcoa Forge
C AF = Colt Alco Forge
C MB = Colt / Mueller Brass
Cardinal (stylized) = Cardinal Forge
CH = Colt Harvey Aluminum
CK = Colt / Kaiser Aluminum
Circle/Crooshairs w/"AR" = ArmaLite
CM = Colt / Martin Marietta
D (stylized) = Diemaco
DK = Diemaco / Kaiser Aluminum
E = Emco
EK = EMCO/Kaiser
E MB = EMCO/Mueller Brass
F keyhole = FNMI / Cerro Forge
FA = FNMI / Anchor Harvey
FK = FNMI / Kaiser Aluminum
FM = FN/Martin Marietta
FMB = FNMI / Mueller Brass
Keyhole = Cerro Forge
L = Lewis Machine & Tool
LK = LAR / Kaiser Aluminum
LM = LAR / Martin Marietta
M (under diamond) = Mueller Industries
PA = Capco / Anchor Harvey
PM = Capco / Martin Marietta 
Square = Brass Aluminum Forging Enterprises


Anyway, I know it's not the right upper for a M12 clone, but as mentioned before, I'm not going full OCD on this build and for me, it's a minor detail (that will probably eat me up inside and fester until I get the right upper).



The M4 feed ramps are there, so that's a good thing right?



I test fit the Aero upper onto one of my CC lowers and it fit pretty well, not a lot of slop and though not a perfect color match (Aero upper is anodized a jet black, while the CC lower is a dark grey), I'm fine with it.





When I dropped it on to my Colt LE6920 lower from my Mk18 build, I was blown away.  It was tighter than my belt after a dinner buffet.  The color match was pretty close, though the camera does pick up the slight variance that is not noticeable to the naked eye.  


I was pretty impressed with the fit, but it probably won't end up on this lower.  I've got one of those stripped KAC SR-15 lowers on order from One Shot Tactical and I hope it fits as well as this Colt LE6920 lower.  


A sum of the parts so far, and so far it's not a good start, lol!  I've got the wrong length of barrel for a Mk12 (20" rather than 18"), I don't have the right upper (Acceptable uppers are Colt, Diemaco and Armalite), I definitely don't have the right charging handle (I think it's supposed to be a PRI Gasbuster like on the Mk18s), but the Diemaco BCG might be Kosher, lol!


I've also picked up a KAC 600m rear back up sight laying around somewhere but forgot to dig it out for this photo.  I'll update this post when I get around to it.

That's all for now :)

Not quite a daisho, but pretty close.

 Not quite a daisho, but close at a quick glance.  A lot of times, daisho didn't have perfectly matched koshirae, or even blades from th...